12 March 2008

BAA ââ¬Ëœfully committedââ¬â¢ to second Stansted runway

Plans for a second runway at Stansted have been submitted by owner BAA in a move sure to spark huge controversy from environmentalists and airlines opposed to the expansion.

The plans call for a two-runway, two-terminal airport to be open in 2015, serving 68 million passengers a year by around 2030.

The Stansted development is in addition to controversial plans for a third runway at BAA-owned Heathrow. 

BAA claims a new runway at the Essex airport would create more than 13,000 new jobs by 2030 and bring Ã&#pound;9 billion in economic benefits to the UK.

The plans show a reduction in land required from around 700 hectares originally earmarked to 442 hectares.

The number of houses required for the expansion would be reduced by over 25% with the number of listed buildings lost reduced from 29 to 13, with 10 of these to be dismantled and rebuilt, BAA claims.

An extra 208 hectares of existing land adjacent to the extended airport boundary would be dedicated to a ââ¬Åâœcomprehensiveââ¬~ nature conservation and landscaping scheme to reduce and offset the effects of the development

Around 70 stringent sustainability targets would be set, including:

*By 2030 Stanstedââ¬â¢s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from energy use will not exceed those in 2006
*By 2030, water supplied to Stansted will be no greater volume than that used by the single runway airport operation at present
*10% or less of waste to landfill by 2030
*By 2030, 70% of waste generated by the airportââ¬â¢s operation will be recycled

Investment is also planned in road and rail improvements.
 
BAA chairman Sir Nigel Rudd said: ââ¬ÅâœWe remain fully committed to building a second runway, a project that is central to government policy in delivering additional runway capacity in the South East.

ââ¬ÅâœThis important project will bring huge benefits to the East of England and UK economy, and will increase choice and opportunity for millions of business and leisure travellers."

Alastair McDermid, BAA Director for Stansted Generation 2, said: ââ¬ÅâœOur proposals represent a significant investment by BAA to deliver the sustainable and responsible growth of air travel in the UK.

ââ¬ÅâœThey allow the national and regional economies to compete in an increasingly global market place and share in the huge social and economic benefits available.

ââ¬ÅâœAt the same time we have worked extremely hard to minimise the environmental  impacts that were anticipated by the Government when it published its Air Transport White Paper in 2003.

ââ¬ÅâœThe potential benefit of a second runway is enormous for business growth, for the creation of thousands of new jobs, for supporting inward investment and for boosting inbound tourism.

ââ¬ÅâœAnd the social and cultural benefits of even greater opportunities for leisure travel and to visit friends and family cannot be underestimated.

ââ¬ÅâœBut this is not growth at any cost. The global issue of climate change is one which we take very seriously and is recognised as requiring international action.

ââ¬ÅâœThere is agreement that the best way of addressing the challenge is through a global emissions trading scheme, and BAA has been leading the call for the aviation industry to be part of that.ââ¬~

by Phil Davies

• PRINT
• SEND TO A FRIEND
• SHARE

Post your comment

Your Comments (2)

, be the first to post a comment.
Your email:

Your comment title:


Your comment:

Email other comments made to this story

5 characters

• Rail linkcertainly needs improving
  
  

  I was pleased to see that they propose improvements to the rail link from Stansted airport, but will it be enough. Compared to many other countries, the 50 odd minutes for the journey into London is a joke. As the out of town airport with space to expand, it surely needs a real high speed train link to London, the rest of the UK, and even the chunnel.

  By Denis Lindsell, Wednesday, March 12, 2008
• demolish current terminal
  
  

  Would it not be better to demolish current terminal which is one of the dirtiest and uncustomer friendly airports I have ever expereienced. How they can think of doubling the size when they cannot cope with the present numbers is beyond me.

  By Dean Mitchell, Wednesday, March 12, 2008