12 March 2008
Bmi, easyJet, Ryanair, Monarch and Virgin Atlantic have joined forces to call for a fundamental overhaul of how the UKââ¬â¢s biggest airports are regulated.
They have followed British Airways and Flybe in condemning the Civil Avaition Authorityââ¬â¢s move to allow BAA to hike airport charges at Heathrow and Gatwick (see previous TravelMole stories).
The increases will ââ¬Åâinevitably hurt consumersââ¬~, the four carriers warn, and follow a substantial increase in charges at Heathrow and Gatwick in the past five years and a doubling of charges at Stansted in the last year.
Stansted charges are also proposed to double in the coming five years.
TheÃ~carriers say the most pressing need is to introduce competition into the system, through three mechanisms.
All four of airlines support the break-up of the BAA London airport monopoly - but this must be accompanied by a price controls regime which better protects the interests of the travelling public ââ¬' replacing one highly-indebted monopoly owner with another would simply compound the problem
Secondly, the CAA should be examining options to allow companies other than BAA to build and operate terminal infrastructure on the airport sites.
Thirdly, each airport must be free to expand in order to provide the capacity that would facilitate ââ¬Åâmeaningful inter-airport competitionââ¬~.
ââ¬ÅâThe OFTââ¬â¢s decision to refer its investigation into BAA to the Competition Commission and the comments made by the Secretary of State for Transport following the CAAââ¬â¢s proposal to remove price controls at Stansted demonstrate that the Economic Regulation Group of the CAA is not protecting the interests of consumers and is skewing its decisions in favour of BAAââ¬â¢s shareholders,ââ¬~ the four airlines claimed.
by Phil Davies
Hotels.com to integrate TripAdvsor reviews
Low cost carriers added by Opodo
Grenade attack on Kenyan nightclub
Crystal Cruises revises policy to curb rebating
Queensland Tourism: It's business as usual with some 'challenges'
Support offered as airline is grounded
UPDATED: Cruise ship search suspended leaving 16 passengers unaccounted for
UPDATED: Ferry sinks with 350 on board
Fat passengers should pay more, says ex Qantas finance chief
Amadeus crash hits thousands of travel agents and passengers
I tripped into the lifeboat, says Costa Captain
Tripadvisor reports major drop in Greek hotel prices
China bans its airlines from joining Emissions Trading Scheme
Only 11% of Brits book their holiday with high street agents
Costa makes compensation offer to passengers
Is the requirement for travel brochures a thing of the past?
You can book now your advertisement for via our online booking service or find out more.
Post your comment
Your Comments (2)
...what you say may be true but the competition is with countries overseas as well. Putting up landing charges in the UK just makes us uncompetitive. On the face of it more users of the airports should make it cheaper to run per head. It sounds like the airlines have a case!
By Paul Johnston, Thursday, March 13, 2008
...don't make me laugh airlines. You have spent the last five years passing on extra charges to consumers at your own behest, are you angry because this is a charge that you can't control? Breaking up the BAA might sound good on paper - and heaven knows, the airports are looking beyond-tired, security is shambolic and flying on UK domestic flights is a nightmare - but having three airports competing for business is just a ploy for the airlines to claw back charges - and don't think for one minute that "savings" will be passed on to consumers. Not when there's a new "Airport Charge" that can be tagged on to those pound;0.00 fares!
By W Shearer, Wednesday, March 12, 2008