20 August 2008
With all the fanfare and constant press coverage of the increasing cost of travel due to rising fuel prices and subsequent airfare, Travelocity decided to take a closer look at how much travelers paid for their summer vacations. Using hotel data of trips consumed by customers in July 2008 compared to those in July 2007, Travelocity was able to identify 14 major US cities where the price difference of a vacation that included a fight and five night stay in a hotel was actually less than a $50 increase compared to last yearââ¬â¢s prices.
ââ¬ÅâThereââ¬â¢s no arguing that the cost of air travel is upââ¬~, said Amy Ziff, Travelocityââ¬â¢s editor at large. ââ¬ÅâBut the mistake many travelers make is that ending their vacation search based on that alone. Hotel pricing in many cities has stayed relatively flat compared to 2007. The hotel stay is typically the most expensive part of any vacation, so steady, an in some cases, decreasing prices means that skipping the vacation this year may not be necessary.ââ¬~
Fourteen popular cities with less than a $50 price difference include Atlanta, Austin, Boston, Chicago, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Orlando, San Diego and San Francisco and others.
By Karen Loftus
UPDATED: Cruise ship search suspended leaving 16 passengers unaccounted for
UPDATED: Ferry sinks with 350 on board
Fat passengers should pay more, says ex Qantas finance chief
Amadeus crash hits thousands of travel agents and passengers
I tripped into the lifeboat, says Costa Captain
Only 11% of Brits book their holiday with high street agents
Costa makes compensation offer to passengers
Olympics will drive 12% of Brits overseas
Thomas Cook admits delays to hotel payments
Will Costa's handling of the compensation issue just make it worse for them?
You can book now your advertisement for via our online booking service or find out more.
Post your comment
Your Comments