Venice to levy tourist tax where will it end LATEST






Are destinations homes, shops or tourist attractions in themselves? Or all three?


The Commune of Venice has agreed to impose a hotel bed tax, commencing on July 1st 2011.
After a meeting on Wednesday morning of the mayors of the Veneto region, the Commune of Venice, led by Giorgio Orsoni, announced that the city will introduce an accommodation tax from 1st July subject to a vote.


LATEST NEWS: According to ETOA (the European Tour Operator's Association):


"Following scenes of protest, walkouts by certain councillors and ultimately a lack of quorum, the debate and vote on Venice"s proposed accommodation tax was delayed on Monday evening (20th June). Outside the chambers people held up banners decrying money being wasted and suggested that not just tourists but also locals will feel more tax burden under the various proposals on the table."


"The fallout from these events is that the council will reconvene tomorrow (Thursday 23rd June) and that any resolution would mean that an accommodation tax is unlikely to come into force before 23rd August. Prior to the council meeting, Mayor Orsoni held conciliatory meetings with the local hotel association, which has expressed its opposition and made clear that it sees managing tourism in the city as a very delicate balancing act. While the proposed tariff system is very similar to Florence"s (one euro, per star, per person, per night), there remains some uncertainty about whether Mestre and minor islands would be charged a lower rate."


The cost, as in Florence, will be 1 euro per person, per night, per star of category for up to a maximum of 5 nights. In the low season (November to February) a lower tariff is anticipated.


Residents of Venice, under-10s, hostels and communal accommodation as well as coach drivers and guides travelling with groups will be exempt.


The initial estimate of 24-26 million euros a year has been downgraded to around 20 million
It is claimed the tax will help infrastructure as well as all Venice"s cultural monuments.


The tax takes advantage of a recent federal law, which allows communes to introduce such 'targeted taxes'.  Local hotel associations and trade body "Confinmercio" have expressed their opposition.





In a recent effort to raise money, Venice has sold advertising hoardings on major tourist sites.


The question is, how does a municipality provide the necessary services (management of tourist sites and historic places and countless others) for tourists without charging them directly?


With a iconic and environmentally-challenged World Heritage Site destination such as Venice, the issue comes into clear and dramatic focus.


Millions of tourists visit Venice each year and clearly impact on the city"s cost of upkeep, which is paid for by local citizens and businesses.


It is easy to assume that Venice, and its population, lives on tourists alone, but, like other destinations, there are many other industries and individuals that see tourism as a threat rather than an opportunity.


Furthermore many citizens in tourist destinations have their quality of life ruined in their home towns by tourist activity. Tourists can clog up streets, public facilities, pry into private houses, drop litter - all of which activity has to be managed, with the cost paid for by locals.


And the more "successful" the destination in terms of numbers of tourists - the worse, and more expensive the problem is for local inhabitants.


Often tourists see places just as destinations, while the industry sees them as shops - we often forget that even in the biggest, most popular tourist destinations, inhabitants see them as their homes!


A relatively low tax on bed-nights is bound to be the thin end of the wedge - at least these tourists stay and provide employment for a range of hoteliers.


The real problem in Venice, and many other big time destinations is low-spending, high leakage cruise ship passengers and day trippers who contribute little to the local economy and come and go in great unmanageable groups.


In this current economic climate, destinations are challenged to raise the maximum income they can with the minimum expenditure - so tourism is bound to be a sitting duck target.


There are many ways of enhancing tourism"s tremendous potential as a key economic driver sustainably, without draconian taxes. Let"s hope that these are examined soon before Venice"s trickle becomes a global flood!


Valere Tjolle


Valere is editor of the Sustainable Tourism Report Suite 2011, special offers HERE


 

Thursday, June 23, 2011



Your Comments (4)

, be the first to post a comment.
Your email:






Email other comments made to this story
Code Request a new picture 5 characters



NOTE: Comments are subject to admin approval before being posted.
  • Would anyone notice...

    ...in Venice? It's such an obscenely expensive place already and few more Euros on a hotel bill would hardly show.

    By Richard English, Monday, June 27, 2011

  • Charge an entrance fee

    Most coach groups stay in Mestre or Marghera on the mainland and commute into Venice for the day. The city itself is quiet after 6pm. So a bed tax will discourage overnight stays and further disadvantage the city's restaurants and bars. Given Venice's unique status and access, it would be better to charge an entrance fee to all visitors, possibly excluding those staying overnight: more revenue, no deterrence of the right kind of visitors.

    By Gary Grieve, Thursday, June 23, 2011

  • Bed tax madness

    The people staying in a destination are the ones who already spend their money there and support local employment, not only in the hotels but in the restaurants, shops and theatres as well. To deter them is total madness. It is the day trippers who demand much (information, facilities) and leave much (rubbish) but contribute little who need to be invited to support the infrastructure of the places they visit. Enough of this bed-tax nonsense: what we need is some common sense and clear thinking.

    By David Tremelling, Wednesday, June 22, 2011

  • A bed tax is not the answer

    The article explains the problem quite well - large volumes of low spending tourists - many of them coming off cruise ships and coaches and not staying the night. How is a bed tax going to generate income from them? By definition they don't use a bed. Many UK tourist towns have a similar problem with short stay coach travellers. It is the people that stay overnight that pump the money into the economy, paying for hotels, eating and drinking in the restaurants and bars and taking in evening entertainment, in theatres, cinemas, night clubs etc.

    By Tony Merrygold, Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Mole Poll
'VisitBritain appeals for more funding' - Should the government gets its cheque book out ?
YES 54.17 %
NO 45.83 %

Thank you for your vote



Get Adobe Flash player
LATEST MOLES' GALLERIES
UPCOMING EVENTS
Sponsored features

The CONRAD New York: A Gem in Lower Manhattan

From spectacular art and interior design, to outstanding culinary and sustainable innovation, the Conrad New York is Lower Manhattan's newest luxury address.

For more information, visit http://www.conradnewyork.com/ 
or watch an interview with Robert Rechtermann, General Manager of the Conrad New York at on TravelMole.tv