Christian BA employee should have won a human rights case against her right to wear a cross, according to TravelMole readers.
A massive 95% agreed with the European Court of Human Rights' decision last week that Nadia Eweida's rights had been violated under Article 9 of the European Convention.
She took her case to the European courts after a UK employment tribunal found she had not been subjected to religious discrimination.
The British Airways employee said she was asked to stop wearing her white gold cross visibly, see previous story.
Thousands voted in our poll asking, "BA Christain employee wins human rights case - correct result?"
Only five per cent felt the result was wrong.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Leonardo Hotels extends contract with RateTiger for future-proof eDistribution and company expansion
Search halted for couple who fell from Carnival cruise
Thomas Cook fury sees agents tweet to the top
Ryanair holiday flight lands at wrong Greek airport
Thomson tells blind couple they can't travel alone
Branson calls for ban on terror warnings
Agent launches Facebook attack on Kuoni
Thomas Cook faces more criticism over call waiting times
Josephides wrong choice for ABTA chair, says industry heavyweight
Thomas Cook TV ad banned over copy-cat fears
Agent's plea to suppliers: Don't make us pay for your delays
You can book now your advertisement for via our online booking service or find out more.
Post your comment
Your Comments
NOTE: Comments are subject to admin approval before being posted.
Imagine how much money could have been saved if the 'people's verdict' had been the agreed outcome before this matter was heard at the European Court? It goes to show that, just like used to be the case in the USA, whenever disputes arise the beneficiaries are likely to include solicitors! One would think it is blindingly obvious she was right.
By Richard Mandunya, Thursday, January 24, 2013