AITO claims hotel booking sites are misleading holidaymakers by quoting prices in sterling at better exchange rates than customers will be able to access.
These sites quote "indicative exchange rates" to give customers a ball-park figure for what they will pay for their room on arrival in the destination; these indicative exchange rates are quoted in the sterling equivalent of the local currency and seem, on the face of it, to be a useful guide, said AITO.
"However, such rates tend to err on the positive site - and the rate your credit card company is likely to charge you could be very different, and certainly not in your favour," said AITO chairman Derek Moore.
"You'll then also be faced with the credit card company's charge for converting currency - a double hit which will, typically, add 3% to 4% to your bill. This can be further aggravated by a change in the exchange rate between the time of booking and when checking out of your accommodation."
AITO said the majority of sites including giants like booking.com, expedia.com and even minnows like mrandmrssmith.com use the xe.com exchange rate when converting prices into sterling, even though they are aware customers cannot access such a favourable rate.
However, Expedia does give customers the option of paying in the UK, in sterling, at the price quoted on its site. For those who want to pay at the hotel, in local currency, it does make it clear that the price is approximate.
But AITO director Alisdair Luxmoore said consumers often didn't realise that the sterling prices quoted on such websites were only an indication of the price, and, as they must pay the hotel direct in the local currency, that they will actually end up paying more.
"Even when they realise they've been charged more than they were expecting, they often will blame their credit card, not realising they were given a misleading quote in the first place," he said.
This week, Booking.com was using an exchange rate of €1.15 to the pound; the best rate we were offered for £500 was €1.12.
Luxmoore admitted the price difference was not particularly significant, but he said that it made the hotel booking sites look more competitive than they actually were. "It's annoying because it would be so easy for them all to agree a realistic exchange rate and stick to it, but while ever one uses xe.com they all will so they don't look more expensive," he said.
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Leonardo Hotels extends contract with RateTiger for future-proof eDistribution and company expansion
Search halted for couple who fell from Carnival cruise
Thomas Cook fury sees agents tweet to the top
Ryanair holiday flight lands at wrong Greek airport
Thomson tells blind couple they can't travel alone
Branson calls for ban on terror warnings
UPDATED: Heathrow re-opens after BA plane makes emergency landing
Flybe to axe all domestic flights from Gatwick
Agent launches Facebook attack on Kuoni
Josephides wrong choice for ABTA chair, says industry heavyweight
Thomas Cook TV ad banned over copy-cat fears
Agent's plea to suppliers: Don't make us pay for your delays
You can book now your advertisement for via our online booking service or find out more.
Post your comment
Your Comments
NOTE: Comments are subject to admin approval before being posted.
how do banks get away with it ? Charging an exchange rate where they make heaps of money & then having the nerve to charge a 3-4% fee on top of that. Sounds like we should revert to cash.
By Michael Anderson, Friday, March 1, 2013