TravelMole - The Online Community for the Travel and Tourism Industry
 Welcome back, NickolaNot you?
LATEST: Help needed in making business travel “greener” US WebSite ASIA/PACIFIC WebSite
RSS
THE MOLE POLL
'Staycation' - Will it be a success in 2010 ?

Yes No

BOOK
NEWSWIRE
AD ONLINE
PRESS ZONE
WHO'S WHO
YOUR
COMMENTS
LIVE AT
       THE MOLE
CAREER ZONE
CONTRIBUTE
Story, Photo, Video
CALENDAR OF
EVENTS
FORUM /
DEBATE
QUESTION
TIME
spacer
spacer
spacer
News Printable version   Email to a Friend
15 November, 2007 Adjust font size: Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size
 
Reversal of hand luggage restrictions welcomed - but concern over wider security measures
Comments: 2


BAA and Visit London today welcomed the government's confirmation that it is to reverse the decision to restrict airline carry-on hand luggage to one item.

The limit is to be lifted from January but security is to be stepped up at UK airports, railway stations and ports as part of anti-terrorism measures outlined by  prime minister Gordon Brown.

Travellers will have to provide a range of information requested when they buy tickets as part of planned electronic checks.

Full details have yet to emerge but some reports suggested travel companies face a bill of 20 million a year compiling the information and this will be passed onto customers via higher prices.

Improved security is to be introduced at the 250 busiest railway stations as well as airports, ports and more than 100 other locations, with guidance going out to hotels, restaurants, sports arenas, cinemas and theatres. 

Meanwhile, Brown said that airports would be able to seek permission from January 7 to allow passengers to take more than a single item of hand luggage onto flights. Size limits on liquids and cabin baggage will remain.

Transport secretary Ruth Kelly said: "I hope to see rapid progress across the whole country - with all airports submitting plans over the next few months.

"But some may need to enforce baggage restrictions to ensure that acceptabale security standards are mainatined throughout. Equally, some airlines may choose to keep bag restrictions for their own operational reasons.

"This is not about relaxing security. It's about allowing airports to take advantage of smarter technologies and imrpoved processes to deliver a better service to the passenger."

A spokesperson for airports operator BAA said: "We welcome the announcement to relax the rules on a phased basis starting in the new year. We believe that this is a sensible approach which strikes the right balance between the needs of passengers and the legitimate demands of security."

Visit London had pressed ministers to reverse the hand luggage restrictions.

Visit London chief executive James Bidwell said: "We welcome the government's decision to reverse the restrictions on hand luggage for passengers.

"Whilst we accept that security must be the primary consideration for policy-makers, limiting baggage to one piece does not fit with the procedures of other airports across Europe and has placed London at a competitive disadvantage. 

"In addition to passenger confusion, feedback from the capital's tourism industry was that the policy was detrimental to repeat trips and short-term business travellers were increasingly considering other European airport hubs to avoid London."

by Phil Davies
 
 
 RELATED STORIES
 MORE 15 NOV BREAKING NEWS
 BOOKMARK with Digg, Facebook, Reditt...
 
 
Printable version   Email to a Friend
 
Add a Comment
 
CONTRIBUTE STORY, PHOTO, VIDEO Contribute story, photo, video

Categories: Airline, Travel Agent, Tour Operator, Business Travel, Destination

 
USER COMMENTS
 
Henryk Handszuh
Chief, Improving CompetitivenessWorld Tourism Organization

16 November 2007, 08:33:54 GMT

Logic in increasing security
There is a logic in it: once started, it will grow and is likely to conquer all the available space.

 
Barry Higgs
15 November 2007, 22:27:21 GMT
Security increased-carry on restrictions decreased
One has to ask-who is driving the bus? The USA requested a few passenger details after 9/11, like passport number, destination address in USA, etc, understanable perhaps, and Mr Blair, Straw & Brown conceded, despite public and press criticism about individual and human rights. Why, if press reports are to be believed, do we now, to the UK authorities, have to provide credit card details, family information, and inside leg measurements? Can you imagine the escalation in identity fraud, as we all know that government systems leak like sieves. As Michael Crichton (the author of Jaws and later, FEAR, predicted, if government projects a reason to fear, the majority of the populace will comply without thought. Is this what holidays and outside the UK are coming to?

 
 
Add a Comment
 
 
top
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT
spacer
spacer
PRESS ZONE
spacer
WHO'S WHOtop
Meet the TravelMole community
Are you listed? This directory of TravelMole users is a valuable source of information about who is who in the travel and tourism industry. Create your own listing and join the TravelMole network - It's free!
TravelMole TV Box
  TravelMole.TV
   LETTERS TO THE EDITORtop
    Tourist Boards Online Marketing
    SHAME ON YOU BBC Southampton!
TravelMole - The Online Community for the Travel and Tourism Industry
© TRAVELMOLE LTD. 2010
Privacy Policy, Including use of cookies . Terms and Conditions . Media Kit. Help . Advertise . Tell a friend. Web design by isd-sign