|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| 14 April, 2008 |
Adjust font size:
|
| |
| Short haul flying to become 'socially unacceptable' for many |
| Comments: 9 |
|
Concerns about the environemt will make short haul flying "socially unacceptable" for many people in the near future, a poll for Eurostar shows.
More than a third (37%) "agree or strongly agree" that in a few years’ time, environmental concerns will rule out short flights where there is an alternative of going by train.
The independent YouGov survey of 2,246 people shows that more than half the UK public (57%) is concerned about environmental impact when planning a journey of 300"400 miles.
A third (33%) say environmental concerns about a short-haul journey are more or much more important to them than a year ago, compared to just 3% who say environmental concerns are less or much less important than before.
One in 20 (5%) say that over the next year or so, environmental concerns mean they plan to switch from flights to train for journeys within the UK or to closer European destinations.
The survey results were unveiled as Eurostar reported a 21.3% rise in passengers to 2.17 million in the first quarter over the same period in 2007.
Revenues were up by 25.2% to £178.4 million during the first full three-month period of journeys on High Speed 1, the new 186 mph line between St Pancras International and the Channel Tunnel.
Eurostar said it achieved record punctuality of 93.6% of trains on time or within 15 minutes of schedule. The company said the on-time performance compared with an average of 68% during 2007 for airlines competing on its routes.
The number of travellers using Eurostar for high-speed journeys to mainland Europe from the regions has gone up since the introduction last November of through fares from 68 towns and cities.
The number of travellers from the East Midlands and Yorkshire more than doubled, compared with a year earlier. Demand from counties north of London, the West Midlands, Greater Manchester and Scotland all increased “very significantly”.
by Phil Davies
|
| |
| |
RELATED STORIES
|
MORE 14 APR BREAKING NEWS
|
BOOKMARK with Digg, Facebook, Reditt...
| BOOKMARK with Digg, Facebook, Reditt... |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
 |
| |
CONTRIBUTE STORY, PHOTO, VIDEO  |
Categories: Sustainable Travel, Travel Agent, Tour Operator, Airline, Business Travel, Destination
| | | USER COMMENTS | | | prices are wrong 3 of us went to London from St Albans (a short train ride) and it cost us nearly £70 return. We took the car the next time instead. Train prices are a joke and this has been a privatisation gone wrong, where it is cheaper on many occasions to take your car or to fly. The answer is not to tax the more efficient aviation and motor industries, but to get the rail companies to get their costs and prices in order and to promote real competition on the railways.
 | | |
Sonja Cameron 14 April 2008, 20:03:23 GMT Survey of Eurostar passengers Surely a poll for Eurostar will be of their customers. This would only be fair if balanced by 2246 people who live on the West Coast or in the North, and have never travelled on eurostar.
Then I would believe the poll to be unbiased
 | | |
Overnight to Scotland I know several people who work for Sky, who have made an effort to book overnight trains from Edinburgh to London instead of doing a day trip by train.
Only problam is availability, you cannot book at the last minute and expect to get a place.
There is no backlash, Eurodestination.com train sales have risen dramatically.
By the way, I live partly in West Wales, and I ALWAYS take the train.
 | | |
Tim Kenworthy 14 April 2008, 16:23:58 GMT Another London survey !! Eurostar may be great if you live in London or the Southeast ,but most of the population don't !!! Until something is done about high speed train links from the rest of the country (as originally promised years ago ) the majority of the population will continue to fly !!
 | | |
Maria Lemos 14 April 2008, 13:17:37 GMT Let it be... more Eurostars I think that this small poll represents what the majority of people think of travelling by train / air: air travel is a drag - stressful, easily cancelled without previous annoucement, requires that the passenger has to be there at least 1 hour before departure. Not to mention the smart looks of those checking in - no shoes, plastic bag on one hand, no accessories. A setting totally adequate to a comic strip.
In my view, train companies like Eurostar are a win-win situation: everyone benefits and the environment, s'il vous plaît.
Maria Lemos
www.sustainablesideofthestreet.com
 | | |
Catherine Mack 14 April 2008, 11:51:09 GMT slow travel guidebook - ecoescape For those who are not so cynical about the growing trends for train over air, please take a look at our website www.ecoescape.org for two new guidebooks on ecoescapes in UK and Ireland, including details on how to access each of the 50 ecoescapes without flying.
 | | |
Neil Wilson 14 April 2008, 11:30:05 GMT Rubbish What a load of Rubbish, I bet the survey was taken in London, where it is quicker and easier to get to Europe by Train.
Most people I know see all the talk about global warming as a way to increase taxes. People will always want to fly and it is unacceptable for business people in Scotland or the North to spend 4-6 hours on a train to London for business meetings.
In fact the backlash against the Green & Enviromentially friendly lobby has already started. A lot of my customers dont believe all the hype.
 | | |
Murray Harrold 14 April 2008, 11:16:37 GMT Stating the Obvious A blindingly obvious poll from YouGov. The only person not listening is the functionally challenged Ruth Kelly. Rail, not air is the future for short haul traffic. We need to get Eurostar on a sound financial footing and invest the Heathrow expansion money in a new East/ West Coast main line and perhaps an extra bore on the Channel Tunnel. The trouble is, airlines, the BAA and airline fuel suppliers, having seen the effect efficient rail has had on European short haul travel, have been lobbying Ms Kelly to make damned sure the same thing does not happen here.......
 | | |
What nonsense! I do not believe that 2246 people represents the UK population as a whole!
It is funny how results can be manipulated. If this survey had been taken on behalf of a lo-co carrier the results would have, of course, been significantly different!
What a waste of time!
 | | | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
 |
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
|
|
WHO'S WHO |
Meet the TravelMole community
Are you listed? This directory of TravelMole users is a valuable source of information about who is who in the travel and tourism industry. Create your own listing and join the TravelMole network - It's free! |
 |
|
TravelMole TV Box
|
 |
|
|