TravelMole - The Online Community for the Travel and Tourism Industry
 Welcome back, MarkNot you?
LATEST: Help needed in making business travel “greener” UK WebSite ASIA/PACIFIC WebSite
RSS
THE MOLE POLL
Would you fly with the flu?

Yes No

BOOK
NEWSWIRE
AD ONLINE
PRESS ZONE
WHO'S WHO
YOUR
COMMENTS
LIVE AT
       THE MOLE
CAREER ZONE
CONTRIBUTE
Story, Photo, Video
CALENDAR OF
EVENTS
FORUM /
DEBATE
QUESTION
TIME
spacer
spacer
spacer
News Printable version   Email to a Friend
11 August, 2009 Adjust font size: Increase Font Size Decrease Font Size
 
V Australia drawn into Virgin/British Airways row


LONDON – British Airways has accused Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin Atlantic of having double standards in attempting to torpedo a move allowing anti-trust immunity for BA and American Airlines.

Sir Richard will take his campaign against the planned BA/AA deal to US Congress next month when he appears before the House of Representatives Judiciary Sub-committee on Competition Policy

The UK Daily Telegraph reports that the Virgin founder is expected to reiterate his view that granting anti-trust immunity to BA/AA will allow the creation of a "monster monopoly", giving the pair an unassailable position on flights between Heathrow and the US.

Willie Walsh, the BA chief executive, has already accused Sir Richard of sounding like a "broken record" in his continued opposition to the tie-up, but the UK flag-carrier has become even more incensed following a Virgin associate's application for its own anti-trust deal.

Virgin Blue, the Australian carrier in which Sir Richard retains a stake of around 26pc, is seeking immunity for a joint venture with US carrier Delta Air Lines that would "expand both carriers' reach between the US and Australia and the South Pacific".

Virgin Blue is seeking the joint venture for V Australia, its new carrier that is facing heavy opposition on the Pacific route from Qantas, United and Delta.

Virgin Blue/Delta said that together they would "be a stronger competitor by offering consumers greater choice of destinations", although the deal is being opposed by Tiger Airways in Australia and Air New Zealand.

Singapore Airlines, which has tried unsuccessfully to be allowed onto the Australia-US West Coast route, said in a submission to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, “If a partnership between airlines leads to fewer flights or an artificial floor on fares … then it begs the question if consumers would be better off from such an arrangement.”

A BA spokesman noted how BA and AA had cited such consumer benefits for their own proposed tie-up.

"We are pleased that Virgin airlines in the southern hemisphere now agree that anti-trust immunity deals can be beneficial for consumers and competition," he said.

"We look forward to this view being maintained by Virgin carriers north of the equator."

Paul Charles, Virgin Atlantic spokesman, told the Daily Telegraph the two proposed tie-ups could not be compared.

"BA/AA is on a completely different scale and is all to do with dominating Heathrow," he said.

 
 
 RELATED STORIES
 MORE 11 AUG BREAKING NEWS
 BOOKMARK with Digg, Facebook, Reditt...
 
 
Printable version   Email to a Friend
 
Add a Comment
 
CONTRIBUTE STORY, PHOTO, VIDEO Contribute story, photo, video

Categories: Airline

 
USER COMMENTS
 
 
Add a Comment
 
 
top
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT
spacer
PRESS ZONE
spacer
WHO'S WHOtop
Meet the TravelMole community
Are you listed? This directory of TravelMole users is a valuable source of information about who is who in the travel and tourism industry. Create your own listing and join the TravelMole network - It's free!
TravelMole TV Box
  TravelMole.TV
   LETTERS TO THE EDITORtop
    Trip Advisor Reviews
    airline delays
TravelMole - The Online Community for the Travel and Tourism Industry
© TRAVELMOLE LTD. 2010
Privacy Policy, Including use of cookies . Terms and Conditions . Media Kit. Help . Advertise . Tell a friend. Web design by isd-sign