Our tourism should be cruising
A report from the Gold Coast says that it may take a few more visits by luxury cruise ships to wake up the Queensland Government to the fact that the Gold Coast, not Brisbane, is the obvious place for a cruise ship terminal.
Southeast Queensland may have to endure a couple of years of the Government’s recovery from a loss of face about its abysmal port for big cruise ships at Fisherman Islands.
The brutal truth is that the Brisbane River and the new $750 million Portside Wharf at Hamilton do not meet the requirements of the big luxury cruiser market.
The river is muddy and unattractive, and Portside cannot be reached by the new super-size ships because they are too tall to fit under the Gateway Bridge.
The Queensland Government has to get past the tradition that the capital city is entitled to all the big ships and the lion’s share of airline traffic. It has to acknowledge that markets outside Brisbane sometimes are better suited to accept international visitors.
The forces railing against making The Spit at Southport into a cruise ship terminal are two-fold — the State Government and the environmentalists who, together, sank the idea of a terminal in the lead-up to the 2006 State election on the basis of flimsy information.
There are those who have a limited vision for the Gold Coast — as a seaside settlement for the weekend amusement of Brisbane people and as a city whose development should be restricted to a few high rises and whose waterways ought to be for the exclusive use of small craft.
But thinking beyond a shallow harbour and a broad picnic area of she-oaks and grass, the Spit and Broadwater could form an aquatic amphitheatre of international repute if ideas are allowed to flow.
With the Brisbane River port finally being recognised as a dud for cruise ships, the time surely has arrived for the Gold Coast to be reconsidered as an international terminal.
The reality came to the surface this week when the luxury liner Queen Victoria visited Brisbane and cruise ship company officials and their paying customers cringed as they sailed up the muddy Brisbane River past the sewage treatment works and factories.
It seems that the ship’s company, Cunard, is thinking of bypassing southeast Queensland or finding another port. A Queen Mary superliner visit next year is uncertain and the Queen Victoria, next time around, will probably sail directly to Cairns.
This is tourism money slipping away, for no good reason, at a time when Australian tourism is in the doldrums. We cannot afford to turn tourists away.
This newspaper has argued for years that a cruise ship terminal should be built on the Gold Coast because this city, whose special subject is tourism, would be perfect as a southeast Queensland stopover.
All we need is a government that can understand the sense of having a cruise ship port here rather than in a city that is obviously unsuitable.
A Report by The Mole and Gold Coast media
John Alwyn-Jones
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.































Qatar Airways offers flexible payment options for European travellers
Airlines suspend Madagascar services following unrest and army revolt
Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Digital Travel Reporter of the Mirror totally seduced by HotelPlanner AI Travel Agent
Strike action set to cause travel chaos at Brussels airports