Published on Thursday, August 23, 2012

ABTA bigwigs accused of misleading public


ABTA has been forced to defend itself after being reported to the Office of Fair Trading for allegedly failing to police members who falsely claim to offer financial protection that no longer exists.


In a statement issued today, ABTA said it had a rigorous system in place to ensure members traded fairly and provided accurate information. It said any members flouting its Code of Conduct could be expelled.


However, Travel Counsellors chairman David Speakman, who made the complaint to the OFT, claimed several high-profile ABTA members were among those making the misleading claims.


Speakman, whose company protects clients' money in a trust account, claimed two members of the ABTA board of directors and four ABTA Regional Agent Council members had misled customers on their websites.


He first complained to ABTA in 2011, but decided to report the matter to the OFT following the recent collapse of ABTA member Express Bookers.


Speakman said: "The travelling public continue to be misled by some ABTA members that state to offer financial protection that no longer exists. ABTA's failure to police their own members vigorously and to implement consequences for non-compliance helps this problem to fester throughout its member network.


"In early 2011 Travel Counsellors wrote to ABTA to complain about a large number of its members stating on their websites and billboards that they were 'fully bonded' and provided complete financial protection to their customers. In response ABTA released a notification in a bulletin to all ABTA agents asking them not to use these terms to describe the protection offered. However this has done little to address the issue and now the company is highlighting a number of key instances where ABTA members continue to mislead the public on their websites.


"Over the last two years we have exchanged emails with ABTA bringing this issue to their attention, asking them not just to issue advisory notes which members can disregard as there are no consequences.


"Such notes play to ABTA's agenda; they can claim they have always advised their members, yet still duck any legal consequences by appearing to 'do the right thing."


ABTA said it monitored members' 9,500 websites to ensure they were not misleading customers, by accident or design.  "We don't monitor web content 24/7 but, through our system of spot checks, any Member that is found making a misleading claim will be asked to remove it or amend it," it said.  "Failure to do so will likely result in a charge being brought against that Member under ABTA's Code of Conduct. 


"In the vast majority of cases, Members act quickly to amend any inaccurate information before they are penalised, however any Member found to be in breach of the Code may be charged and, as a result, fined or ultimately expelled from the Association. 


"ABTA has for many years worked with the Office of Fair Trading to enforce transparency across the industry, and we will continue to do so."



By Linsey McNeill

Story Image

Your Comments

, be the first to post a comment.
Your email:

Email other comments made to this story
Code Request a new picture 5 characters

NOTE: Comments are subject to admin approval before being posted.
  • ABTA is a dinosaur

    Set up to not protect the industry but create barriers to industry it is the internet that will dismantle ABTA. It is a relic of years gone by and when foreign websites can trade with UK consumers the requirement for dinosaurs like ABTA are over. It is a disgrace that they not policing their membership effectively enough and I would ask how many have actually been expelled in all these years???

    By Andy Parr, Thursday, August 23, 2012

  • Where is public protection now?

    When ABTA abandoned their bonding arrangements, they didn't appear to let the anyone outside the trade know and the general public still believe that the ABTA sign equals financial protection when it is patently not an absolute guarantee any more. An excellent travel association in many ways but the abandonment of their bonding structure changed the game. The ATOL is the most watertight guarantee as far as I can work out although the mini ATOL has been seriously taken advantage of through overtrading. The 'flight plus' thing is a joke. (in my opinion) Things in the industry have moved so fast that no bureaucracy, quango, or association (especially european ones) appears to have been able to keep up. The end result is that honest traders in tourism are being priced out by those who offer no protection at all (mainly on the internet.) It is good that David Speakman is highlighting the issue of ABTA members not being properly policed, although insurances and trusts are not necessarily the answer either. We must all face the fact that the introduction of tour operators margin scheme VAT on package holidays very effectively dismantled the package holiday industry and created a disparate mess. ABTA tried to stem the tide of companies abandoning packages and therefore their association, but clearly could not, so abandoned public financial protection instead. We are Aito members because Aito stayed true to the ethos of as full as possible financial protection for the travelling public. David Speakman is right in that ABTA simply cannot offer what they used to offer in that arena, although I have no doubt that they offer many other excellent benefits. I hope you guys can sort out your differences. From where I sit, both tour operators and the general public just want a simple system of guarantee that they will get their holidays and not lose their money. Barrie Neilson Sailing Holidays Ltd

    By Barrie neilson, Thursday, August 23, 2012

Mole Poll
Drinking limitation at UK airports - Good idea ?
YES 67.92 %
NO 32.08 %

Thank you for your vote

Move scroll bar (above) left to right for more videos!

Sponsored features

Delivering a seamless customer experience

Great Customer Experience can have a huge impact on a company's bottom line, and it starts with understanding your customer's expectations at each stage of the buying process.