AITO calls for XL APD to be repaid
XL Leisure Group holidaymakers who were left out of pocket with the failure of the operator should have their Air Passenger Duty refunded.
The call came from the Association of Independent Tour Operators, which estimated that around £1 million could be paid back to people who held advance bookings with the failed group’s airline.
The organisation also joined industry calls for airlines to fall in line with operators and provide financial failure protection to customers.
AITO chairman Derek Moore said: “Just looking at XL’s 200,000 advance bookings for holidays and flights that now don’t exist, we estimate that 80,000 of these could be flight-only bookings.
“If you simply take the minimum APD payment of £10 per person, that’s a massive £800,000 that XL’s administrators, Kroll, are sitting on.
“The likelihood is that it’s closer to £1 million in advance tax collected by XL for the Government.
“It’s a £1 million windfall for the administrators of a failed company and we don’t believe this is right.â€
He added: “The XL collapse has demonstrated clearly the many loopholes that exist in financial protection for consumers – and this is another one.
“Tax collected by the airlines should be ring-fenced in some way to ensure it doesn’t simply get absorbed into the financial mess created by a failed company.â€
Moore said that with bonded tour operators, client money – including tax – is not at risk.
“Failed bonded tour operators are covered by the Civil Aviation Authority’s ATOL system, which has rescued the clients of the failed XL companies at a cost of many millions of pounds. The money comes either from bonds paid up front by tour operators and/or from the new £1 passenger levy.
“Other tour operators affected by a collapse – and there were many in the XL situation – take a personal financial hit, as it is the tour operators’ responsibility to ensure that the client gets the holiday as booked.â€
AITO claims that key anomalies in consumer protection have been created by the internet with many consumers booking direct with airlines, which – despite selling holidays and flights in exactly the same way as tour operators – are not subject to the same financial protection rules.
But AITO believes that to expect consumers to understand complex travel industry rules and regulations is unrealistic.
“The only sensible way forward is to rationalise the rules and to ensure that airlines are brought within the consumer protection remit of ATOL. We shall be lobbying Government on this front and on the APD issue.
“In such a volatile economic climate, the airlines can no longer claim to be impervious to potential collapse.â€
*See linked Cheapflights/APD story.
by Phil Davies
Phil Davies
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.

































TAP Air Portugal to operate 29 flights due to strike on December 11
Qatar Airways offers flexible payment options for European travellers
Airlines suspend Madagascar services following unrest and army revolt
Air Mauritius reduces frequencies to Europe and Asia for the holiday season
Major rail disruptions around and in Berlin until early 2026