Firm slams £25 ATOL refund fee

Monday, 16 Nov, 2011 0

 

 

Plans by the Civil Aviation Authority to charge agents an administration fee of £25 for each passenger refunded following the collapse of an ATOL-protected flight has been criticised by the trade.

 

The proposal is included in an annex to the Civil Aviation Authority’s ATOL reform Information Paper, published on Monday. It is the first time the trustees of the Air Travel Trust Fund have suggested charging agents a fee for refunding customers.

 

The Paper said: “This charge is intended to meet the cost in administering the contribution claims.The trustees consider this a reasonable cost for the Flight-Plus arranger to incur, given the statutory obligations on the arranger as well as the trustees’ policy on repatriation and contributions.

 

“In addition, the trustees consider the typical charge is unlikely to be materially more than the commission payments or booking fees that agents typically earn on flight-only bookings.”

 

But On Holiday Group chief executive Steve Endacott said: “What gives the CAA the right to impose a £25 admin fee if agents can not charge admin fees in a collapse?”

 

He was also critical of the CAA’s plan to cap contributions to individual agents at 2% of their annual licensed turnover, subject to a minimum £50,000 (regardless of turnover) and a maximum of £2.5m.

 

Endacott said: “What justification is there for the 2% of turnover restriction?  I do not follow the logic…why not 100% payment?”

 

He also queried the legality of the CAA’s plan to get access to pipeline monies following the collapse of a supplier in order to speed up refunds. The CAA said changes would be made to ATOL Standard Terms making it a requirement for ATOL holders to inform customers that money paid would be held for the benefit of the trustees of the Air Travel Trust at all times.

 

It said: “The agent therefore collects and holds money for the principle but ultimately owes this to the ATT if the ATOL holder fails.”

 

Endacott said the move might not be legal and also pointed out it might not be acceptable to credit card companies, who may demand the monies to cover their losses in the event of a supplier failure, or indeed suppliers.

 

Endacott said the Information Paper “clarifies a lot of key points” but warned there was an “enormous” amount to achieve before the reforms are implemented in April.

 

By Linsey McNeill



 

profileimage

Linsey McNeill

Editor Linsey McNeill has been writing about travel for more than three decades. Bylines include The Times, Telegraph, Observer, Guardian and Which? plus the South China Morning Post. She also shares insider tips on thetraveljournalist.co.uk



Most Read

Vegas’s Billion-Dollar Secrets – What They Don’t Want Tourists to Know

Visit Florida’s New CEO Bryan Griffin Shares His Vision for State Tourism with Graham

Chicago’s Tourism Renaissance: Graham Interviews Kristin Reynolds of Choose Chicago

Graham Talks with Cassandra McCauley of MMGY NextFactor About the Latest Industry Research

Destination International’s Andreas Weissenborn: Research, Advocacy, and Destination Impact

Graham and Don Welsh Discuss the Success of Destinations International’s Annual Conference

Graham and CEO Andre Kiwitz on Ventura Travel’s UK Move and Recruitment for the Role

Brett Laiken and Graham Discuss Florida’s Tourism Momentum and Global Appeal

Graham and Elliot Ferguson on Positioning DC as a Cultural and Inclusive Global Destination

Graham Talks to Fraser Last About His England-to-Ireland Trek for Mental Health Awareness

Kathy Nelson Tells Graham About the Honour of Hosting the World Cup and Kansas City’s Future

Graham McKenzie on Sir Richie Richardson’s Dual Passion for Golf and His Homeland, Antigua
TRAINING & COMPETITION
Skip to toolbar
Clearing CSS/JS assets' cache... Please wait until this notice disappears...
Updating... Please wait...