Heritage site “threatened by tourists”
One of Britain’s oldest and most famous heritage sites is under threat because it is being visited by too many tourists. According to The Times, Hadrian’s Wall, built by the Roman Emperor Hadrian in AD 122, is being eroded so severely that it could be placed on the World Heritage Site’s “in danger” list. The problem has been caused, the newspaper reports, because of a walking trail that runs alongside the famous wall. Since the path was opened last year some 400,000 people have walked along it and, while walking on top of the wall is banned, many visitors still choose to do so. The newspaper reports that, on one occasion, 800 Dutch bankers walked along the wall on day last winter. Professor Peter Fowler, of Unesco, who opposed the creation of the trail, is quoted as saying that most visitors were “out for a good walk. That’s fine, but walk somewhere else. “A fragile archaeological site should not be used. This needs more close management of the trail on the ground so that people can be moved a few yards one way or the other and to encourage people not to walk on the wall. The wall was never built to take 400,000 people.” Report by Tim Gillett, News From Abroad Ltd www.newsfromabroad.com
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.
































Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
Euromonitor International unveils world’s top 100 city destinations for 2025
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports