Irene: did she get way too much attention?
Rail and air service should be back to normal today after the disruption of Hurricane Irene but in its anry wake, some observers are asking a timely question: Was the media coverage of Hurricane Irene, which was downgraded to a tropical storm on Sunday, hyped out of all proportion?
“Was all the fuss just plain panic prompted by the US media?” a commentator said in the New York Times. The newspaper noted that the hurricane ended up “falling far short of the historic disaster that many people had feared.”
There certainly was serious damage from the storm. It led to the deaths of at least forty people in eleven states, according to the AP. At one time, 3.3 million East Coast residents were without power, according to Reuters, down from a high of more than 5 million. Estimated damages ranged from US$7 billion to $13 billion in an ABC News report. It was among the costliest disasters in US history.
But not everyone agreed.
“Someone has to say it: cable news was utterly swept away by the notion that Irene would turn out to be Armageddon,” The Daily Beast’s Howard Kurtz wrote. “National news organizations morphed into local eyewitness-news operations, going wall to wall for days with dire warnings about what would turn out to be a Category 1 hurricane, the lowest possible ranking.”
But on the other hand, journalist Chris Mooney, writing for DeSmogBlog, argued that a failure to explore worst-case scenarios would have been “downright dangerous.”
Others expressed the same sentiment.
“Hype on,” said a Philadelphia Daily News editorial, “We’d rather be over-prepared … as for the back-to-back round-the-clock coverage of Irene and the warnings about its catastrophic potential, we wonder: What else do you do about a hurricane described as the ‘size of Europe’ as it heads toward densely packed cities?”
Hurricanes are obviously serious business and have the capacity to cause billions of dollars in damages and kill many people. It’s also unusual for a hurricane to hit the more populous Northeast region of the US.
Some commentators say the coverage was too much wall-to-wall, but the Times researcher Nate Silver said it “received only the 13th most media coverage among Atlantic hurricanes since 1980.”
Hurricane Gustav three years ago had as much coverage and it was not devastating, by way of comparison.
“It wasn’t the worse-case scenario …but I don’t see how you dismiss it as hype,” Silver wrote.
By David Wilkening
David
Vegas’s Billion-Dollar Secrets – What They Don’t Want Tourists to Know
Visit Florida’s New CEO Bryan Griffin Shares His Vision for State Tourism with Graham
Chicago’s Tourism Renaissance: Graham Interviews Kristin Reynolds of Choose Chicago
Graham Talks with Cassandra McCauley of MMGY NextFactor About the Latest Industry Research
Destination International’s Andreas Weissenborn: Research, Advocacy, and Destination Impact
Graham and Don Welsh Discuss the Success of Destinations International’s Annual Conference
Graham and CEO Andre Kiwitz on Ventura Travel’s UK Move and Recruitment for the Role
Brett Laiken and Graham Discuss Florida’s Tourism Momentum and Global Appeal
Graham and Elliot Ferguson on Positioning DC as a Cultural and Inclusive Global Destination
Graham Talks to Fraser Last About His England-to-Ireland Trek for Mental Health Awareness
Kathy Nelson Tells Graham About the Honour of Hosting the World Cup and Kansas City’s Future
Graham McKenzie on Sir Richie Richardson’s Dual Passion for Golf and His Homeland, Antigua
ADS PRO 
Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
Euromonitor International unveils world’s top 100 city destinations for 2025