Solution for crying children: put them in cargo hold
There should be an airline section for families only, say a majority of those surveyed by Skyscanner.
“Non-parents particularly liked the idea with 68 percent voting in favor,” the site said.
Less than one-third of parents agreed.
Over 2,000 people voted in the Skyscanner poll; just 8 percent of child-free respondents thought people should be entitled to sit where they like, while almost more than two-thirds “wanted to sit as far away as possible from children.”
Almost a quarter of non-parents went one step further saying that they would prefer flights that were free from children altogether.
Other suggestions put forward by Skyscanner users to solve the problem of noisy children on flights included: the provision of a baby nursery, only allowing well-behaved children to travel, and on a less sympathetic note, one user said “children should go in the cargo hold.”
By David Wilkening
David
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.
































Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports
Euromonitor International unveils world’s top 100 city destinations for 2025