Thomas Cook wins fake holiday illness case and warns of further action
A County Court judge has ordered a couple to pay court costs after they falsely claimed they had been taken ill on a Thomas Cook all-inclusive holiday.
Court rules state claimants are not at risk of paying costs even if they lose the case, unless it can be demonstrated to the court that they had been fundamentally dishonest.
The judge at Liverpool County Court yesterday concluded the couple, who hoped to sue Thomas Cook for £10,000, had indeed been ‘fundamentally dishonest’ and had not suffered any illness at all.
As such, the claimants were ordered to pay £3,744 within 28 days.
Thomas Cook said this is the first of a number of cases it will take to court where necessary when it sees claims for illness which were ‘unreported in resort and which demonstrate a clear lack of evidence’.
In a statement, the operator said: "This is a significant case which sends a clear message to claimants – we will not pay claims which we believe to be dishonest, and we will take further action where necessary.
"It is hoped that that this judgment is reflective of increasing judicial awareness of the industry’s concerns about the prevalence of fraud and demonstrates that the courts will not sanction dishonest claims, or accept claimants’ evidence at face value."
The couple, Julie Lavelle and her partner Michael McIntyre, booked a 14-day all-inclusive holiday for themselves and their two young children at the Parque Cristobal Hotel, Playa del Ingles, Gran Canaria from July 29-August 12 2013.
Three years later, without any prior warning, solicitors Bridger & Co of Landovery, Carmarthernshire, issued a claim for £10,000, saying the whole family had suffered gastroenteritis on the third day of their holiday as a result of inadequate food hygiene at the hotel.
They claimed symptoms had continued from the third day throughout the holiday until after the family’s return to the UK.
However, Thomas Cook had evidence to the contrary, including the fact that on the return flight McIntyre had completed and handed in a detailed feedback questionnaire.
Although the section on illness was unanswered, in relation to the majority of the questions McIntyre recorded that the service supplied had been good or excellent.
McIntyre explained in court that the inconsistent questionnaire was filled in on the flight home after he had drunk six pints of lager and that entries were either randomly ticked or ticked so as to put a favourable gloss on the trip so that he would be more likely to benefit from a prize draw incentive for handing in the form.
Lavelle said that though her son and baby daughter had had diarrhoea and vomiting lasting around four-five days she had sought no medical treatment and that she had not felt any need to mention the family’s difficulties to hotel staff, the tour representative or anyone else.
She and her family had managed to make a four-hour flight home without incident despite ongoing symptoms.
Upon the return home she and her partner returned to work the following day, and her children returned to nursery.
She had other reasons to see her GP within a few days and had made no mention of continuing gastroenteritis symptoms which she asserted at trial, in her witness statement, and to a medico-legal doctor.
Her baby daughter was also taken to see a GP six days after returning from holiday as a result of another illness, where Ms Lavelle discussed her recent holiday but made no mention of her child’s gastroenteritis to the doctor.
The judge therefore found that the claimants’ accounts were wholly implausible and they had not suffered any illness at all.
The court dismissed their claim and made an order that Julie Lavelle and Michael McIntyre, but not their children, would have to pay costs of £3,744 within 28 days.
Thomas Cook UK managing director Chris Mottershead said: "We’re pleased that the judge found in our favour.
"In these cases, we will not accept liability and we will take further action where we believe it is necessary to protect all of our customers."
Lisa
Lisa joined Travel Weekly nearly 25 years ago as technology reporter and then sailed around the world for a couple of years as cruise correspondent, before becoming deputy editor. Now freelance, Lisa writes for various print and web publications, edits Corporate Traveller’s client magazine, Gateway, and works on the acclaimed Remembering Wildlife series of photography books, which raise awareness of nature’s most at-risk species and helps to fund their protection.
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.

































TAP Air Portugal to operate 29 flights due to strike on December 11
Qatar Airways offers flexible payment options for European travellers
Airbnb eyes a loyalty program but details remain under wraps
Air Mauritius reduces frequencies to Europe and Asia for the holiday season
Major rail disruptions around and in Berlin until early 2026