Planned new UK air tax could penalise long haul carriers
A planned new air tax could raise the cost of family holidays outside Europe by £90, it has been claimed.
Aviation industry body the British Air Transport Association calculates that British families will have to pay £250 just to leave the country in 2011, up from £160 now.
The warning came at the end of a consultation period on government proposals to introduce a new aviation duty to be levied on every departing aircraft to replace Air Passenger Duty.
The new tax is expected by the Treasury to raise more than £3.5 billion in 2011-12 against £971 million from APD in 2006-07, according to BATA.
The association’s secretary general Roger Wiltshire claimed that the proposals would subsidise foreign carriers and airports because it would make it cheaper for travellers to connect to a hub on the Continent to then fly long-haul rather than taking a flight direct from the UK.
“Passengers who choose to make their long-hail journey via an airport in another EU state would benefit from a windfall reduction of 75%. These passengers currently pay £40 APD whereas in the future they would only pay short haul aviation duty of around £10.
“This large incentive will not only create significant competitive disadvantage for airlines providing long-haul services from UK airports such as Heathrow, it will also encourage more indirect journeys, with the increased emissions that result.”
He claimed that the plan would deliver “questionable environmental benefits”as it is not linked to the emissions of a particular aircraft.
“So it provides no incentive to invest in more environmentally friendly aircraft, yet will threaten the UK’s air links, economy and families,”added Wiltshire.
He went on to say: “We accept the principle that aviation should meet its environmental and social costs. Indeed, as the government has alraedy accepted, the industry meets its climate change costs in full following the doubling of APD last year.
“We feel strongly that the proposed new duty fails to meet its environmental objectives and the amount the Treasury is planning to rake in is excessive and unjustified.
“The proposal also creates new and significant market distortions.
“Furthermore, it is logical that aviation duty should be abolished when the European wide system of emissions limits and trading includes air travel, which is expected in 2012, to ensure passengers do not pay twice.”
by:Phil Davies
Phil Davies
Vegas’s Billion-Dollar Secrets – What They Don’t Want Tourists to Know
Visit Florida’s New CEO Bryan Griffin Shares His Vision for State Tourism with Graham
Chicago’s Tourism Renaissance: Graham Interviews Kristin Reynolds of Choose Chicago
Graham Talks with Cassandra McCauley of MMGY NextFactor About the Latest Industry Research
Destination International’s Andreas Weissenborn: Research, Advocacy, and Destination Impact
Graham and Don Welsh Discuss the Success of Destinations International’s Annual Conference
Graham and CEO Andre Kiwitz on Ventura Travel’s UK Move and Recruitment for the Role
Brett Laiken and Graham Discuss Florida’s Tourism Momentum and Global Appeal
Graham and Elliot Ferguson on Positioning DC as a Cultural and Inclusive Global Destination
Graham Talks to Fraser Last About His England-to-Ireland Trek for Mental Health Awareness
Kathy Nelson Tells Graham About the Honour of Hosting the World Cup and Kansas City’s Future
Graham McKenzie on Sir Richie Richardson’s Dual Passion for Golf and His Homeland, Antigua
ADS PRO 
Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
Euromonitor International unveils world’s top 100 city destinations for 2025