Tourists would shun eco-tax, say agents
UK consumers wouldn’t even pay an extra £7.50 for a carbon-free holiday that might prevent or reduce global warming and protect some of the destinations they visit, according to the majority of travel agents.
Following a recent report that suggested that damaging CO2 emissions from the travel industry could be eliminated at a cost of just $11 per passenger, a researcher from the University of Waterloo said he thought most people would think this an acceptable amount.
He said the best way to control emissions from the travel industry, which accounts for almost 5% of worldwide manmade CO2 emissions, was to increase energy prices or charge a tax.
"The price for this is surprisingly low: for only USS11 per trip, tourism could decarbonizes," said Dan Scott. "Most people would think this is an acceptable price for a sustainable future."
However, a TravelMole industry poll found that almost 55% of readers thought tourists wouldn’t pay £7.50 for a carbon-free holiday.
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.































Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
In Italy, the Meloni government congratulates itself for its tourism achievements