TUI boss blasts APD u-turn
Sunday, 15 Mar, 2011
0
TUI chief executive Peter Long has hit out at weekend reports that the government planned to dump the proposed per-plane levy as an alternative to APD.
The government has admitted that it could not find a way forward with the idea.
Downing Street is reported as telling a reporter: “We tried and tried [to find a way of implementing the policy] and it just wasn’t workable.”
International aviation regulations that make taxing plane fuel illegal have caused the impasse.
But Long said the tax would be far fairer and more environmentally friendly.
In a statement, he said: “Each of the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats committed in their election manifestoes to replace APD with a per plane tax. This commitment was repeated in the Coalition Agreement.
“This was, and is, the right policy and represents a promise made by this Government to the British people. It forms part of the basis upon which this Government was elected.
“APD in its current form is not focused on environmental benefit. A per plane tax would be the simplest way of reforming this tax and achieving a tax system that properly rewards and incentivises environmentally responsible behaviour. We expected the government to stand by its commitments to reform the aviation taxation system in this way.”
He added: “We are surprised by the comments that a per plane tax may breach the Chicago Convention. The method of calculation we had proposed to Government would be one that mirrored the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS). If EU ETS is compliant with the Chicago Convention, then we believe that a Per Plane Duty would be equally compliant.”
Long said that if APD was to be retained, changes needed to be made.
He said: "The government must, as a minimum, make changes to the current banding system and to the tax rates for premium economy seating. The current banding system sees flights to the Caribbean taxed more heavily than flights to Hawaii or the West Coast of the USA.
“Customers choosing premium economy seating and, who are seeking a bit of extra legroom on their holiday flight are at present asked to pay the same amount out of their own pocket as a businessman flying first or business class on expenses.”
by Dinah Hatch
Dinah
Have your say Cancel reply
Most Read
TRAINING & COMPETITION
Posting....
Skip to toolbar
Clearing CSS/JS assets' cache... Please wait until this notice disappears...
Updating... Please wait...
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.
































Qatar Airways offers flexible payment options for European travellers
Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports
Skyscanner reveals major travel trends 2026 at ITB Asia
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists