FCO’s new policy gives operators a headache
Tour operators are claiming the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s new policy of issuing warnings against travel more sparingly is forcing them to make difficult decisions about taking holidaymakers to troubled destinations. In June, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw outlined significant changes to the travel advice following a six-month review and pressure from tour operators to take a more lenient approach. The Foreign Office said in future it would advise against travel to a country only if the threat was ‘extreme and dangerous’. Travel companies, which for insurance purposes cannot offer tours if the government advises against travel, were initially delighted, particularly as places such as Bali, where more than 200 people were killed in a bomb attack in 2002, came off the blacklist. But four months on, tour operators are complaining the onus is now on them to judge whether a destination is safe. The issue has been highlighted by the increase in violence in Nepal. Under the new guidelines, the Foreign Office has warned there is a high threat of violence from Maoist rebels, including bombing and shooting in public places and tourist areas. It has provided updates, including a recent ceasefire and an increase in the intensity of violence. It has not, however, warned British travellers to avoid Nepal. Bales has stopped tours, while others have decided to continue. Mandy Nickerson, managing director of Bales, said: “We stopped treks some time ago because Maoists were demanding money from people, but with the bombing of hotels, we consider the situation too dangerous. “It’s very difficult for tour operators because we have to make a moral decision about whether to stop trips or not. Before it was very simple: the Foreign Office would advise against travel and we would stop.” A spokesman for Exodus said: “We are monitoring the situation closely and continuing trips, but it is very difficult. The Foreign Office can’t win – it gets criticised for being too hard or too soft.” Andy Cooper of The Federation of Tour Operators sympathised with operators, saying under the previous policy, Nepal would be off limits. A spokeswoman for the Foreign Office said: “We listen to operators’ concerns, but the advice is there for individuals to make up their own mind about travel.”
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.
































TAP Air Portugal to operate 29 flights due to strike on December 11
Qatar Airways offers flexible payment options for European travellers
Airlines suspend Madagascar services following unrest and army revolt
Digital Travel Reporter of the Mirror totally seduced by HotelPlanner AI Travel Agent
Strike action set to cause travel chaos at Brussels airports