Government says no to APD review
Fair Tax on Flying campaigners are "extremely disappointed" that the Government is refusing to budge on Air Passenger Duty and has rejected calls for a review.
The Government said yesterday that it has "no plans to undertake a review of the economic impact of APD at this point" despite recommendations for a review by the Transport Select Committee.
"Rather than examining specific taxes in isolation, Government’s focus is on improving the efficiency and competitiveness of the tax system as a whole in order to achieve its objective of having the most competitive tax system in the G20," said a Government statement.
In May, the Transport Select Committee said a fully-costed study of how far APD impacts on the UK economy should be undertaken.
The Committee said if this provided clear evidence that the tax causes harm to the economy or to government revenue, it should be significantly reduced or abolished.
A PwC report, commissioned by major airlines, concluded that abolishing APD would boost the UK economy.
But the Government said it disagrees with the findings and believes abolishing APD would have a lesser impact on GDP than the report claims and would lead to a net loss of tax receipts, which would then "need to be paid for through tax rises or spending cuts elsewhere, which would themselves have an economic impact."
Darren Caplan, chief executive of the Airport Operators Association which is a supporter of the Fair Fax on Flying campaign said: "It is extremely disappointing to see that despite the wealth of evidence suggesting that APD is negatively affecting the UK economy, the Government is still refusing to act.
"The UK could be even further down the road to recovery if our leaders abandoned their current unwillingness to encourage jobs and growth through reform of this unfair and regressive tax."
Simon Buck, chief executive of the British Air Transport Association, added: "There is mounting evidence to show that the sky high level of tax on flying in the UK costs jobs and disincentivises investment.
"The Government needs to be less defensive on this issue and listen to what business is saying."
Many European countries including Belgium, Holland and Denmark have abandoned their aviation taxes due to the negative effects on their economies.
Bev
Editor in chief Bev Fearis has been a travel journalist for 25 years. She started her career at Travel Weekly, where she became deputy news editor, before joining Business Traveller as deputy editor and launching the magazine’s website. She has also written travel features, news and expert comment for the Guardian, Observer, Times, Telegraph, Boundless and other consumer titles and was named one of the top 50 UK travel journalists by the Press Gazette.
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.

































Turkish tourism stalls due to soaring prices for accommodation and food
CCS Insight: eSIMs ready to take the travel world by storm
Germany new European Entry/Exit System limited to a single airport on October 12, 2025
Airlines suspend Madagascar services following unrest and army revolt
Qatar Airways offers flexible payment options for European travellers