It’s not too late to fight ‘flight plus’, says Endacott
He might be away in Australia, but that won’t stop On Holiday Group CEO Steve Endacott continuing his fight against the Government’s proposed Flight Plus scheme.
Here’s what he had to say from Sydney:
“Surprisingly the Government’s press release on the ATOL reform barely bothered to dress up the need to replenish the coffers of the CAA with the gloss of Consumer protection.
So its with even greater annoyance, that I note that yet again UK airlines have got away scot free and flight-only sales are deemed not to require financial protection, even though this would be the quickest and most efficient way of protecting customers and replenishing the ATTF.
Could somebody please explain to me why a customer needs financial protection, just because they book “Flight Plusâ€. What exactly about the “Plus†requires financial protection to kick in?
Invariably, it is the collapse of an airline e.g. XL, which causes the most disruption to customers’ holidays, yet customers can continue to book millions of holidays on British Airways, Ryanair and Easyjet without any financial protection at all? Where exactly is the logic in that?
If a customer “dynamically†packages a holiday themselves by booking a flight and then clicking through to a related accommodation provider, apparently they are not booking a package holiday. However, if a travel agent does the exact same thing on their behalf, not only do they have to pay the CAA holiday tax, they now have to take financial responsibility for the airline. How on earth can the CAA expect travel agents to be able to afford to pay the cost of replacing low-cost, charter or scheduled flights in the case of an airline failure, given the margins they know agents make?
The answer is simple……it’s not their problem!!!
The fair solution is a £1 levy, added to the APD fee already being successfully collected by airlines. This way, any time a holidaymaker steps on a plane, they are protected against an airline collapse. If the Government is truly concerned with other elements of the holiday collapsing, by all means impose a further charge of £1.50 on travel agents to create a fund to pay out claims.
Few agents would complain compared to the blatantly unfair trading landscape that is proposed and the suicidal nature of the taking financial responsibility for airline failure.
It is NOT to late to fight the “Flight Plus†shambles, but the industry must unite under one retail banner, which has to be ABTA. John McEwen and Mark Tanzer seem to be up for the fight, so lets get 100% behind them.”
Bev
Editor in chief Bev Fearis has been a travel journalist for 25 years. She started her career at Travel Weekly, where she became deputy news editor, before joining Business Traveller as deputy editor and launching the magazine’s website. She has also written travel features, news and expert comment for the Guardian, Observer, Times, Telegraph, Boundless and other consumer titles and was named one of the top 50 UK travel journalists by the Press Gazette.
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.

































Qatar Airways offers flexible payment options for European travellers
Airlines suspend Madagascar services following unrest and army revolt
Digital Travel Reporter of the Mirror totally seduced by HotelPlanner AI Travel Agent
Strike action set to cause travel chaos at Brussels airports
All eyes on Qatar as Qatar Airways leads a season of global events