Virgin delivers objections to BA-AA deal
Saturday, 12 Apr, 2010
0
The European Commission has been urged to consider the impact on passengers before approving a transatlantic tie-up between British Airways and American Airlines.
BA rival Virgin Atlantic said it had yet to see any concrete consumer benefits identified that could justify the Commission agreeing to anti-trust approval for the deal.
Virgin claims that BA/AA will use their exemption from competition laws and their “overwhelming dominance” to destroy competition, raise prices and reduce choice
BA/AA will have a monopoly or be dominant on some of the busiest and most profitable routes between the US and Heathrow, it argues.
Airline president Sir Richard Branson said: “I remain extremely concerned that consumers are not being put first in the European Commission’s decision-making process.
“No evidence of consumer benefits has been put forward. The Commission needs to throw out the commitments proposed by BA and AA which are insufficient in allaying the Commission’s concerns set out in its Statement of Objections.
“The problems with the remedies are wide-ranging – they are totally inadequate, both in scope and substance.
“A significant failing of the proposals is that there is no ‘fix it first’ approach, which would protect consumers from abuse by ensuring that competitors take up the remedies before BA and AA could start their collusion.
“It is clearly in BA and AA’s interests to offer the least attractive remedies possible so they do not face any additional competition.”
Sir Richard was speaking as the carrier submitted its response to the Commission’s Market Testing report detailing the airline’s key concerns with the commitments offered by BA and AA regarding planned alliance.
Key issues which Virgin Atlantic identifies within its submission include:
· The remedies fail to adequately address the significant barriers to entry including slot constraints, frequency advantage, hub dominance and access to connecting traffic that the Commission itself identified in its Statement of Objections.
· The number of slots are insufficient and the slots are not to be provided from existing frequencies – BA and AA will continue to have “massive” frequency advantage.
· Releasing slots only on a leasehold basis disincentivises new entry and the risk that competitors will end up paying for the leases would mean that not only will the competitors have to right the wrong but they may also pay for the privilege.
by Phil Davies
Phil Davies
Have your say Cancel reply
Most Read
TRAINING & COMPETITION
Posting....
Skip to toolbar
Clearing CSS/JS assets' cache... Please wait until this notice disappears...
Updating... Please wait...
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.
































CCS Insight: eSIMs ready to take the travel world by storm
Germany new European Entry/Exit System limited to a single airport on October 12, 2025
Airlines suspend Madagascar services following unrest and army revolt
Qatar Airways offers flexible payment options for European travellers
Air Mauritius reduces frequencies to Europe and Asia for the holiday season