Virgin delivers objections to BA-AA deal

Saturday, 12 Apr, 2010 0

 

 
 
The European Commission has been urged to consider the impact on passengers before approving a transatlantic tie-up between British Airways and American Airlines.
 
BA rival Virgin Atlantic said it had yet to see any concrete consumer benefits identified that could justify the Commission agreeing to anti-trust approval for the deal.
 
Virgin claims that BA/AA will use their exemption from competition laws and their “overwhelming dominance” to destroy competition, raise prices and reduce choice
 
BA/AA will have a monopoly or be dominant on some of the busiest and most profitable routes between the US and Heathrow, it argues.
 
Airline president Sir Richard Branson said: “I remain extremely concerned that consumers are not being put first in the European Commission’s decision-making process. 
 
“No evidence of consumer benefits has been put forward. The Commission needs to throw out the commitments proposed by BA and AA which are insufficient in allaying the Commission’s concerns set out in its Statement of Objections.
 
“The problems with the remedies are wide-ranging – they are totally inadequate, both in scope and substance.
 
“A significant failing of the proposals is that there is no ‘fix it first’ approach, which would protect consumers from abuse by ensuring that competitors take up the remedies before BA and AA could start their collusion.
 
“It is clearly in BA and AA’s interests to offer the least attractive remedies possible so they do not face any additional competition.”
 
Sir Richard was speaking as the carrier submitted its response to the Commission’s Market Testing report detailing the airline’s key concerns with the commitments offered by BA and AA regarding planned alliance.
 
Key issues which Virgin Atlantic identifies within its submission include:
·         The remedies fail to adequately address the significant barriers to entry including slot constraints, frequency advantage, hub dominance and access to connecting traffic that the Commission itself identified in its Statement of Objections.
·         The number of slots are insufficient and the slots are not to be provided from existing frequencies – BA and AA will continue to have “massive” frequency advantage.
·         Releasing slots only on a leasehold basis disincentivises new entry and the risk that competitors will end up paying for the leases would mean that not only will the competitors have to right the wrong but they may also pay for the privilege.
 
by Phil Davies 


 

profileimage

Phil Davies



Most Read

Vegas’s Billion-Dollar Secrets – What They Don’t Want Tourists to Know

Visit Florida’s New CEO Bryan Griffin Shares His Vision for State Tourism with Graham

Chicago’s Tourism Renaissance: Graham Interviews Kristin Reynolds of Choose Chicago

Graham Talks with Cassandra McCauley of MMGY NextFactor About the Latest Industry Research

Destination International’s Andreas Weissenborn: Research, Advocacy, and Destination Impact

Graham and Don Welsh Discuss the Success of Destinations International’s Annual Conference

Graham and CEO Andre Kiwitz on Ventura Travel’s UK Move and Recruitment for the Role

Brett Laiken and Graham Discuss Florida’s Tourism Momentum and Global Appeal

Graham and Elliot Ferguson on Positioning DC as a Cultural and Inclusive Global Destination

Graham Talks to Fraser Last About His England-to-Ireland Trek for Mental Health Awareness

Kathy Nelson Tells Graham About the Honour of Hosting the World Cup and Kansas City’s Future

Graham McKenzie on Sir Richie Richardson’s Dual Passion for Golf and His Homeland, Antigua
TRAINING & COMPETITION
Skip to toolbar
Clearing CSS/JS assets' cache... Please wait until this notice disappears...
Updating... Please wait...