www.crikey.com.au’ view of the Qantas surcharge reduction
The often controversial web site www.crikey.com.au has taken a pretty strong swipe at the Qantas surcharge reduction and this is what they said:-
Qantas reduces fuel surcharge by $5 … gee, thanks
The oil price is 32% off its peak levels, so Qantas has decided to reduce its controversial fuel surcharge on some routes . . . by a grand total of $5 which is less than 5%.
But wait, there’s more: the surcharge — of $370 return for some routes — will remain in place for all flights to Europe, the US, Canada, South America, South Africa and India.
The recent surcharge reduction will only apply to flights to Asia, New Zealand and domestic routes. The pitiful reduction is akin to a millionaire leaving a $2 tip on a $500 meal.
As justification for the meagre decrease, Qantas executive general manager, John Borghetti claimed that “despite hedging and surcharges, [Qantas is] still under-recovering the cost of fuel price increases by hundreds of millions of dollars, even with the recent drop in jet fuel prices.”
However, Borghetti’s claim was contradicted yesterday a Macquarie Bank report which claimed that Qantas is on track a record profit figure of more than $1 billion this year. (Macquarie would have a fair understanding of Qantas: Chinese Walls aside, the bank is deeply involved with the potential PE buyout of Qantas with Allco Equity Partners and Texas Pacific Group.) Quite simply, Qantas (which operates in monopoly or duopoly markets for some of its routes) is creaming consumers, frequent fliers and travel agents with an unnecessary surcharge – all the while the ACCC has not so much lifted a finger to protect consumers and the tourism industry.
However, Qantas isn’t only hurting consumers, it is also doing its bit to damage Australia’s fragile tourist sector (which Crikey noted on Monday was the worst performing tourism market in the work).
Yesterday, Tourism Minister, Fran Bailey, stepped in, calling on Qantas to increase capacity on the under-serviced Pacific Route. Currently, Qantas shares a very cosy duopoly with United Airlines over the Pacific and has intentionally kept capacity low to maintain a near 100% load. Capacity is so tight that some business travellers have not even been able to secure a business class seat to the US, despite the cost being around $16,000 for a return trip to New York (compared with around $10,000 for a return trip of a similar distance to London).
Unnecessary fuel surcharges, record profits, price gouging in a duopoly – where the bloody hell are you Graeme Samuel?
To subscribe to Crikey visit www.crikey.com.au
Report by The Mole from www.crikey.com.au
John Alwyn-Jones
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.

































Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
Euromonitor International unveils world’s top 100 city destinations for 2025