British Airways fined £270m for fuel price fixing
A Reuters report says that British Airways has been hit with almost £270 million ($NZ720m) in fines as it reached settlements with US and UK authorities for price fixing on fuel surcharges.
Virgin Atlantic Airways blew the whistle on British Airways (BA) last year after individuals at the two carriers discussed proposed changes to fuel surcharges for long flights.
Virgin won immunity in the UK, where the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) fined BA £121.5 million ($NZ324m) in the OFT’s biggest-ever civil penalty.
The US Department of Justice fined BA $US300 million ($NZ395m) as part of a wider investigation that also resulted in a fine for Korean Air Lines and notice that Virgin and Germany’s Lufthansa would have to pay restitution to customers.
“This resolves the OFT’s and the DoJ’s (US Department of Justice) investigation of British Airways,” BA said in a statement to the London Stock Exchange.
Virgin was not available for immediate comment.
The fines, already the biggest in BA’s history, could have been higher if the airline had not admitted wrongdoing.
“Had BA not made admissions and cooperated from the outset, they would have been fined many millions of pounds more … tens of millions of pounds,” OFT director of cartel operations Simon Williams said in a telephone interview with Reuters.
“This is the largest civil fine ever imposed by the OFT,” he said, adding that he hoped it would serve as a deterrent and encourage businesses to come forth with information before their rivals do. “Businesses up and down Britain have to ask themselves some very hard questions.”
Two senior BA executives quit last October after being linked to the investigation and in May BA set aside £350 million ($NZ933m) as a provision for possible fines.
BA said it expected that provision to cover the fines and any impact from a separate, widespread probe of the airline industry regarding cargo fuel surcharges which also involve authorities in Europe, Canada, Australia, South Africa and New Zealand.
Analysts said the UK fine was in line with expectations, given the provision already taken, and noted BA could have fared far worse.
“The fine is less than the maximum 10 percent of revenue that could have been imposed,” said Citigroup analyst Andrew Light in a research note that carried a 580 pence target price for BA and a “Buy/High Risk” investment rating.
“This news is already fully priced in,” he said.
The price fixing related to surcharge increases which took place from 2004 until 2006.
Fuel surcharges soared from £5 to £60 ($NZ13 – $NZ160) per ticket on typical BA or Virgin long return flights during the period, but BA Chief Executive Willie Walsh defended the rises, which came as crude oil prices surged.
“I want to reassure our passengers that they were not overcharged,” he said.
BA said both the OFT and the US Department of Justice would continue with criminal investigations into the conduct of individuals involved.
Shares in BA were down 1.89 percent at 390 pence by 1437 GMT, while the FTSE 100 index.
Report by The Mole
John Alwyn-Jones
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.
































Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
In Italy, the Meloni government congratulates itself for its tourism achievements