Stansted acted against public interest, say competition chiefs
The Competition Commission is recommending that maximum airport charges at Stansted rise to £6.56 per passenger in 2009/10.
In a report released today, it recommends that charges subsequently increase by no more than retail price index (RPI) inflation plus 1.75% each year, reaching a maximum of £7.05 per passenger in 2013/14.
This compares with projected charges for 2008/09 of £6.34 per passenger.
The Civil Aviation Authority will now consider the recommendations and carry out further consultation before making its final decision in March 2009.
The Commission’s report follows a six-month inquiry, which was requested by the CAA under the Airports Act 1986.
Competition chiefs also found that Stansted Airport had acted against the public interest in February 2002 to April 2008 by:
– failing to consult properly with airlines on the development of the airport and its capital expenditure plans
– failing to manage as effectively as possible the security queuing process
– failing to offer appropriate landing charges for larger cargo aircraft.
The Competition Commission said the CAA must ensure BAA improves the consultation process and introduce a service quality rebate scheme, similar to those already in place at Heathrow and Gatwick, which impose financial penalties if airports fail to meet standards.
BAA should also offer off-peak discounts on landing charges for the largest cargo aircraft, it said.
However, the Commission said it did not agree with Ryanair’s claim of excessive pricing at Stansted.
Based on the Commission’s recommendations, the CAA will issue its own price control and other proposals for Stansted Airport by December 9 and then put these out for an eight-week consultation.
New price controls are due to come into effect at the airport for the five-year period starting April 1.
EasyJet said it welcomed the recommendations and congratulated the Commission for its “clear-headed analysis”.
“Today’s report sets out categorically what we have known for some time – that there are significant failings in BAA’s approach to consultation. BAA has kept airlines in the dark on too many major decisions, but has expected us to pick up the bill for its excesses,” it said in a statement.
“Last year, the CAA chose to ignore the CC’s recommendations with regard to pricing at Gatwick Airport – a decision that is now the subject of a Judicial Review claim by easyJet. We urge the CAA to listen to the CC this time at Stansted – and put the interests of the travelling public above those of BAA.â€
The Competition Commission’s full report is available here:
http://www.caa.co.uk/default.aspx?catid=78&pagetype=90&pageid=10232
By Bev Fearis
Bev
Editor in chief Bev Fearis has been a travel journalist for 25 years. She started her career at Travel Weekly, where she became deputy news editor, before joining Business Traveller as deputy editor and launching the magazine’s website. She has also written travel features, news and expert comment for the Guardian, Observer, Times, Telegraph, Boundless and other consumer titles and was named one of the top 50 UK travel journalists by the Press Gazette.
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.































Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
Euromonitor International unveils world’s top 100 city destinations for 2025
U.S.A. and Israel attacks on Iran impact air movements in the Gulf (Update 1.00pm CET)