US aviation officials investigate three consecutive incidents on United flights
Three consecutive in-flight incidents on United Airlines flights over the weekend are under investigation by the FAA and by the airline itself.
On Saturday, United Flight 96 from Newark to Berlin took off at 5:50 in the evening. Soon after takeoff one of its engines began spitting fire.
A report that a tire had blown, fueling the fire, was later dismissed by the FAA.
The flight returned safely to the airport after several hours circling Newark to burn fuel.
Then, United Flight 409 from Newark to Seattle on Sunday took off at 8:55 a.m. and returned to the airport after 20 minutes in flight because of what has been reported as an unusual smell or smoke in the cockpit, later reported as a possible air conditioning problem.
The third incident occured on United Flight 1124 out of George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston bound for Boston.
The flight returned to the airport “out of an abundance of caution” after problems with one of the Boeing 737’s engines.
United said they were conducting a “thorough review” of all incidents.
Meanwhile, the Internet has been abuzz with talk that the three incidents, one right after the other on the same airline, were due to the recent merger with Continental.
ABC News Aviation consultant Steve Ganyard cited a “huge spike” in customer complaints since the merger.
“Now we’re seeing a rash of in-flight emergencies, the FAA is going to want to ask are they having the same problem integrating their maintenance.”
The FAA issued the following statement on the incidents to TravelMole and other media yesterday evening:
“Commercial airlines operate 35,000 to 40,000 flights throughout the United States every day.
“Pilots are trained to make an emergency landing for a variety of different scenarios, including engine problems, hydraulic problems, fuel leaks, injured crew members and other issues. Because of the high safety standards in commercial aviation, U.S. commercial pilots make emergency landings to address those issues every day.
“Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspectors dedicated to oversee specific airlines review all commercial airline emergency landings as part of routine oversight.
“The FAA also increases inspector oversight during airline mergers. The FAA’s initial review of United’s emergency landings over the weekend has not identified any connection between the three incidents.”
by Gretchen Kelly, Editor TravelMole US
Bev
Editor in chief Bev Fearis has been a travel journalist for 25 years. She started her career at Travel Weekly, where she became deputy news editor, before joining Business Traveller as deputy editor and launching the magazine’s website. She has also written travel features, news and expert comment for the Guardian, Observer, Times, Telegraph, Boundless and other consumer titles and was named one of the top 50 UK travel journalists by the Press Gazette.
Have your say Cancel reply
Subscribe/Login to Travel Mole Newsletter
Travel Mole Newsletter is a subscriber only travel trade news publication. If you are receiving this message, simply enter your email address to sign in or register if you are not. In order to display the B2B travel content that meets your business needs, we need to know who are and what are your business needs. ITR is free to our subscribers.

































Phocuswright reveals the world's largest travel markets in volume in 2025
Cyclone in Sri Lanka had limited effect on tourism in contrary to media reports
Higher departure tax and visa cost, e-arrival card: Japan unleashes the fiscal weapon against tourists
Singapore to forbid entry to undesirable travelers with new no-boarding directive
In Italy, the Meloni government congratulates itself for its tourism achievements